What affects us?
Review findings about your brand, domains, accounts and external infrastructure in your organization’s context.
CYBER-BRO Threat Intelligence Platform
See external threats in your business context.
Validate signals about your brand, accounts and infrastructure with evidence. Decide which findings to address first.
SOC and CTI teams · Incident response · CISO
CYBER-BRO / FINDINGS
SELECTED FINDING
Lookalike domain
- To validate
- Domain name and page content
- Assigned to
- Brand / SOC team
Product example · No live monitoring data
External risks in one place
Sources and evidence alongside findings
Priorities based on business impact
CONTEXT FOR ANALYSIS
The full context
of every finding.
An IP, domain or account alone does not explain the full risk. CYBER-BRO connects signals to your assets and verifiable evidence.
Is the conclusion supported?
Check the source, time and artifact. Separate verified evidence from assumptions and signals that need investigation.
What comes next?
Assess impact, assign an owner and turn a finding into a clear investigation or response task.
INSIDE THE PLATFORM
Evidence and conclusions
side by side.
See how a finding is investigated. Open the evidence, relationships and next actions tabs.
CYBER-BRO INTELLIGENCEINTERFACE EXAMPLE
BRAND / DOMAIN MONITORING
Analysis requiredLookalike domain
INDICATORexample.invalid
TYPEDomain
OWNERBrand / SOC team
| Evidence | Validation question | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Domain name | How closely does the name match the brand? | Review |
| Page content | Has the brand or sign-in form been copied? | Review |
| Source and time | Is the observation recent and independently corroborated? | Review |
Analyst note
A similar name warrants investigation. A phishing conclusion needs page content and additional evidence.
What is it related to?
- Domain → DNS → IP address
- Domain → TLS certificate
- URL → page artifacts
A shared IP or hosting provider does not prove a single actor. Validate the relationship using time and other evidence.
CONCLUSION
Analysis requiredA decision supported by evidence
Missing evidence and the next validation step are recorded explicitly.
- 01SOC investigation
Check internal email and proxy telemetry for contact with the domain.
- 02Validate with the brand owner
Verify whether the domain and page belong to the organization.
- 03Respond after validation
Initiate blocking, user notifications or a takedown request.
MONITORING AND ANALYSIS
Capabilities for the assets
you protect.
Monitoring scope and modules are selected around your organization’s threat model, assets and priority risks.
Brand and phishing
Monitor lookalike domains, fake pages and signs of brand impersonation.
BRAND / DOMAIN / FAKE PAGEAccount and data exposure
Validate the source, recency and relevance of externally exposed accounts or data.
ACCOUNT / EXPOSURE / IMPACTThreat actors and campaigns
Analyze attack methods, target selection and infrastructure relationships.
ACTOR / CAMPAIGN / TTPContextual indicators
View IPs, domains, URLs and hashes with sources, timestamps and related artifacts.
IP / DOMAIN / URL / HASHVulnerabilities and exposure
Compare vulnerability signals with asset exposure and business importance.
VULNERABILITY / ASSET / PRIORITYAnalyst conclusions
Turn a technical finding into a task with an owner, validation criteria and a next step.
EVIDENCE / CONCLUSION / ACTIONWITH YOUR TEAM
Findings become
actionable tasks.
Connect intelligence to SOC investigations, incident response or leadership decisions. Scope, output formats and integrations are agreed at the start.
SIEM / SOARAPI / WEBHOOKSTIX / TAXIITICKETING
Integration support is validated against the product version, licensing and customer environment.
Define monitoring scope
Identify brands, domains, accounts and critical assets.
Add analysis to evidence
Compare sources, observation times and infrastructure relationships.
Route the task to the right team
Process findings as tasks with an owner, priority and next action.
USE CASES
The right conclusion
for every team.
From technical observations to business impact: one finding can call for different actions across teams.
SOC and threat hunting
Validate indicators against internal telemetry. Develop hunting hypotheses from related infrastructure and TTPs.
Output: validation criteria and contextual IOCs.
Incident response
Validate lookalike domains or account exposure using evidence. Identify affected assets and response scope.
Output: a finding with an owner and a next step.
CISO and leadership
Identify threats to important business processes. Direct resources toward priority risks.
Output: a concise assessment of business impact.
CYBER-BRO RESEARCH
Local threats.
Research reports.
Explore CYBER-BRO reports on threat intelligence and the Uzbekistan context.
CYBER-BRO / REPORT
Data Leak Report
Report on data breaches involving Uzbek citizens.
Read the report ↗
CYBER-BRO / REPORT
Cyber Threat Intelligence Report
CYBER-BRO cyber threat intelligence report.
Read the report ↗BEFORE YOU START
Questions you
may have.
How does the platform work with SIEM or EDR?
SIEM and EDR provide internal telemetry and detection. Threat Intelligence enriches investigations and priorities with external threat context. Integration requirements are agreed during implementation.
What is needed to start monitoring?
Identify organization domains, brand names, authorized assets and priority risks. Agree on data-sharing scope and responsible contacts.
Is every finding a confirmed attack?
A signal may require investigation. Assess source reliability, evidence recency and asset relevance before drawing a conclusion.
What will we see in a demo?
A relevant scenario demonstrates findings, evidence, relationships and analyst conclusions. Monitoring scope, modules and integration needs are discussed.
START WITH CYBER-BRO
See the platform
in your threat model.
Start with your assets and priority threats. Use the demo to discuss scope, modules and implementation requirements.